Contributions Of Western Moral Thinkers And Philosophers

Contributions of Western Moral Thinkers and Philosophers

• 20 May 2024
• 25 min read

Who was Socrates?

• About:
  • Socrates (469-399 B.C.E.) is generally acclaimed as the father of Western philosophy.
  • He exhibited the philosophical attitude of distanced and unaffected intellectual reflection, moral courage, spirit of an educationist, etc.
• Philosophy of Socrates:
  • Socrates view on life:
    • For Socrates, it wasn’t just about knowing how to gain power, but about understanding how to live our lives rightly.
    • Rather than knowing what constitutes life, it was more important to know what constitutes a ‘good’ or ‘virtuous life.’
    • The objective of life is to lead a ‘good life.’ And in order to lead a good life, we should have ‘the knowledge’ of ‘good life.’
    • In the words of Socrates, “Unexamined life is not worth living.”
  • Socrates view on knowledge:
    • For him, the awareness of one’s ignorance was the first stage in order to acquire knowledge.
    • In a Socratic sense, such a person was already ‘wise’.
    • The virtue (excellence or knowledge) cannot be taught or learned according to Socrates, it can only be drawn out for such a knowledge is already within us. Thus, lecturing does no good.

Who was Plato?

• About:
  • Plato is the well-known Greek philosopher and student of Socrates.
  • He was a student of Socrates and the teacher of Aristotle.
  • Plato wrote on a wide variety of topics including mathematics, ultimate reality, ethics, and politics.
  • Plato is known as the ‘father of political philosophy’ since he was the first person (in the Western world) to give an elaborate theory of state and politics.
• Philosophy of Plato:
  • The Theory of The Philosopher King:
    • The biggest contribution of Plato is ‘The Theory of The Philosopher King.
    • According to him, that state is ideal, where philosophers are the rulers.
    • In the words of Plato “Unless political power and philosophy meet together there can be no rest from troubles for states, nor for all mankind.”
  • View on Knowledge:
    • In The Republic, Plato uses the story of the “allegory of the cave” to illustrate the three different levels of understanding and help us illustrate the difference between illusion (ignorance) and real knowledge.
    • People prefer to live in the den of ignorance, and develop their comfort zone. However, it is the duty of a teacher to push them forcibly out of the cave and show them the reality.
  • View on Justice:
    • He suggests that justice is the greatest good that people can attain individually and collectively, and all of his theories point in this direction.
  • View on State:
    • The purpose of Plato is to create an ideal state of perfect justice.
    • According to Plato, justice denotes a virtue or a state of excellence, characterized by reason in the soul dominating over courage and appetite.
    • He suggests that a just state is one where the philosophers rule and other classes perform the functions in accordance with the nature of their soul.
    • According to Plato, “justice is the greatest good that people can attain as individuals and as members of a political community.”
  • View on Education:
    • Imparting education is one of the most important functions of the state.
    • Education is the primary means of socialization.
    • The education system plays a critical role towards making obedient citizens.
    • He favored a system of state-sponsored education (universal education).
    • He emphasized the study of mathematics and logic which develops the rational faculties of mind.
  • In The Republic, Plato says that the soul has three parts, corresponding to Reason ( or wisdom), Courage, Appetite.

Who was Aristotle?

• About:
  • He is known as the father of Political Science.
  • Aristotle’s book Politics made an important contribution in the development of political philosophy.
  • He is also regarded as the originator of many important ideas like the rule of law, deliberative democracy, etc. in Western history.
• One of his prominent statements on the theory of state is “Man is by nature a political animal.” It means nature has not made man in such a way that he can live without state.
• Philosophy of Aristotle:
  • Theory of Revolution & Justice:
    • His theory of justice is based on practical considerations, unlike Plato’s very abstract theory of justice.
    • He said “It is unjust to treat equal unequally and it is equally unjust to treat unequal equally.”
    • He discussed justice in two dimensions:
      • Rectificatory Justice: It is linked to the system of grievance redressal, administered by courts. He gives the principle of proportion i.e., penalty should be in proportion to the harm done.
      • Distributive Justice: It is linked with the distribution of resources, honors, awards etc. State should reward the person in proportion to his contribution to society. A person whose work is more important for society ought to get more.
  • Rule of Law:
    • The rule of law represents the limitations on the powers of executives.
    • Executive has to act according to the law, they cannot act in an arbitrary manner.

Who was Jeremy Bentham?

• About:
  • Jeremy Bentham (1748—1832) was the father of utilitarianism.
  • Utilitarianism is a moral theory that argues that actions should be judged right or wrong to the extent they increase or decrease human well-being or ‘utility’.
• Philosophy of Jeremy Bentham:
  • Utilitarianism:
    • He advocated that if the consequences of an action are good, then the act is moral and if the consequences are bad, the act is immoral.
    • As a self-proclaimed atheist, he wanted to place morality on a firm, secular foundation.
    • This doesn’t mean we can do whatever we like. Importantly, for Bentham, it is not just one’s own happiness or pleasure that matters.
      • He notes, “Ethics at large may be defined, the art of directing men’s actions to the production of the greatest possible quantity of happiness.”
      • The moral agent will perform the action that maximizes happiness or pleasure for everyone involved.

Who was John Stuart Mill?

• About:
  • John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was an influential philosopher, economist, politician, and senior official in the East India Company.
• Philosophy of John Stuart Mill:
  • Utilitarianism:
    • Expanding on philosopher Jeremy Bentham’s original doctrine, John Stuart’s Mill’s utilitarianism has three basic tenets:
      • Pleasure or happiness is the only thing that has true, intrinsic value.
      • Actions are right insofar as they promote happiness; wrong insofar as they produce unhappiness.
      • Everyone’s happiness counts equally.
    • ‘Happiness’ means pleasure and the absence of pain; by ‘unhappiness’ means pain and the lack of pleasure.
  • View on freedom:
    • He defended classical liberal ideals such as the freedom of individuals against absolute state power, and the importance of free speech and disagreement.
    • Published in 1859, John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty is one of the most celebrated defenses of free speech ever written.

Who was Jean-Jacques Rousseau?

• About:
  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 – 1778 CE) was a philosopher of the 18th century who mostly lived and was active in France.
  • His political philosophy influenced western Europe, including aspects of the French Revolution and the development of modern political thought.
  • Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality and The Social Contract are cornerstones in contemporary political thought.
• Philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau:
  • View on State of Nature:
    • He suggested that the state of nature wasn’t all that bad, proposing that the people in it were self-sufficient, fairly solitary by choice, sympathetic to others, and peaceful.
    • Since morality hasn’t been invented yet, they are innocent and incapable of being malicious.
    • Importantly, people in the state of nature are free in that they can follow their own will all the time, and the various sources of inequality haven’t been invented yet.
    • He argues that it is only when we move into society that human nature becomes corrupted, and many of the vices and evils we know all too well can flourish.
  • View on Private property:
    • Private property, a concept enabled by society, earned Rousseau’s ire for promoting greed and egotism.
  • Social Contract:
    • His alternative is to create a social contract that will allow all members of the society to be as free as they were in the state of nature.
    • It will ensure that everyone is equal before the law that they create.
    • The key to Rousseau’s social contract theory, and his biggest idea, is a take on the “general will.”
      • The general will is the will of the entire body politic, which exists independently of the will of any one member or any group of people that comprise it.
      • All laws and actions the state undertakes must be in line with it.

Who was Thomas Hobbes?

• About:
  • Thomas Hobbes is an English political philosopher best known for his contribution to social contract theory.
• Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes:
  • Individualist theory:
    • According to Hobbes, man is individualistic by nature and social only out of necessity. Hobbes is a scholar of Possessive Individualism.
    • Individualism means man is prior to state, it means self-interest is supreme.
    • According to him, the right to life is so sacred that man can even kill another person for the protection of his life. Means right to life includes right to self-defense.
  • View on State:
    • The most important purpose, for which the state exists, is preservation of life. The state which cannot protect life is a failed state.
    • State is an institution which has monopoly over the use of coercive force on a territory. Any other organization using force is not permissible.
  • View on Social Contract:
    • In the state of nature, there was no security of life, it was the state of war, life was nasty, poor, brutish and short. Hence for the sake of security of life, man enters into the contract and creates the state.
    • The most important function of the state is the protection of life. Right to life is the supreme right. Even the state cannot take the life of man in an arbitrary manner.
  • View on Liberty:
    • Hobbes does not prefer liberty. According to him, extreme liberty results in anarchy. In the state of anarchy, there is no guarantee of even the right to life.
    • When authority of state is absolute, man has no freedom to act according to his choice.
    • Man is under compulsion to act according to the law. Man will be punished in case he does not act according to law.

Who was John Rawls?

• About:
  • John Rawls was an American moral and political philosopher in the liberal tradition.
  • He condemned utilitarianism because he opined that it paves the way for governments to function in ways that bring happiness to a majority but ignore the wishes and rights of a minority.
• Philosophy of John Rawls:
  • View on Justice:
    • He is best known for his political-philosophical publication A Theory of Justice (1971).
    • The very purpose of Rawls introducing the theory of justice was to find a way to create a well-ordered society having following two elements:
      • Advance the good of its members and effectively regulated by a public conception of justice.
      • All people accept and know that all other people accept the same principles of justice and that the basic social institutions satisfy those principles.
    • Rawls described two kinds of circumstances of justice objective and subjective circumstances.
      • Objective Circumstances:
        • It refers to circumstances that give rise to a situation in which the members of a society co-exist in some identifiable territory and are of some comparable strengths and weaknesses so that no one has an edge over another.
        • The most significant objective circumstance of justice is the one in which the resources available to a society are moderately scarce. If the resources are too abundant or too scarce, there will not be enough scope for social cooperation.
      • Subjective Circumstances:
        • It refers to circumstances that give rise to a situation in which few members of the society have conflicting interests in the resources available.
        • When such interests contradict the mutually advantageous social cooperation, a need for justice arises.
    • Two principles of justice:
      • The members of a society would be led by reason and self-interest to agree upon the following two principles of justice:
        • The Principle of Equal Liberty: As per the principle of equal liberty, all the people in the society must be given certain liberties that are basic for human existence. Such liberties can not be infringed at any cost, even if they may cause greater benefit to a larger mass of people. Some of the basic liberties as stated by Rawls were the freedom of speech, assembly, thought and conscience, liberties required to secure the rule of law, sanitation, wealth, and health.
        • The Principle of Difference and Fair Equality of Opportunity: Rawls’ second principle of justice states that social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both:
          • To the greatest benefit of the least advantaged. It is also called the difference principle. It provides that in case of an unequal distribution of wealth and income, the inequality must be such that those that are worst off are still better off than they would be under any other distribution.
          • Attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity. It is also called the fair equality of opportunity principle. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to compete for the public or private offices or positions that they wish for. This includes providing education, and healthcare.

Who was Immanuel Kant?

• About:
  • Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was a German enlightenment thinker who is widely regarded as one of the most important philosophers of the modern world.
• Philosophy of Immanuel Kant:
  • View on Freedom:
    • Kant’s understanding of moral freedom and of moral principles has been central to discussions of morality.
    • Freedom, for Kant, is thus not the “freedom” to follow one’s inclinations. Instead, freedom implies morality, and morality implies freedom.
    • To act morally is to act “autonomously,” meaning to act according to the law that one gives oneself.
  • Concept of Categorical Imperative:
    • In the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant outlines his fundamental ethical principle, which he calls the “Categorical Imperative.”
    • The moral principle is “imperative” because it commands, and it is “Categorical” because it does so unconditionally, that is, irrespective of the particular inclinations and circumstances of the actor.
    • This moral principle is given by reason and states that we may act only in such a way that the maxim of our action, i.e. the principle governing our action, could be willed as universal law. For example, one is forbidden to act on the maxim “lie whenever it provides an advantage” because such a maxim would destroy trust among humans, and with it the possibility of gaining any advantage from lying.
    • Those who act on non-universalizable maxims are caught in a kind of practical contradiction.
    • People must always respect humanity in ourselves and others by treating humans always as ends in themselves, and never merely as a means.
  • View on Politics:
    • Kant’s political philosophy is entwined with his moral philosophy. Political activity is ultimately governed by moral principles based on human autonomy.
    • Human freedom and dignity must be respected, and this is possible only within a constitutional state governed by law, which protects the civil rights of individuals.
    • When executive and legislative powers are invested in a single body, the government becomes despotic because law is no longer universal but is determined by a particular will.
    • Direct democracies thus are inevitably despotisms because the majority oppresses the minority rather than acting according to universal law.
    • Kant abjures the idea that subjects ought to revolt against existing governments to create more perfect ones.
      • He regards any “right to revolution” as incoherent because states are the only existing embodiment of right.
      • Instead, Kant argues that subjects always have a duty to obey their governments, though they may use their public reason to criticize them.
      • He puts in his essay “Perpetual Peace,” that the problem of civil government can be solved even for a race of devils, if they are intelligent.
  • View on International Relations:
    • Kant argues that a state of perpetual peace is required morally.
    • For perpetual peace to occur, all states must possess a republican civil constitution, participate in a union of states, abolish standing armies, and refuse to take on national debts for war, among several other conditions.
    • As individuals and states pursue their interests through the medium of growing commerce, they find that war is incompatible with profit. States will thus avoid war in order more effectively to pursue wealth.